As some think I am being over dramatic when it comes time this election and it’s importance I take a reality check to see if this is one of the most important elections we have faced for a lo…
Source: ‘A matter of life or death
As some think I am being over dramatic when it comes time this election and it’s importance I take a reality check to see if this is one of the most important elections we have faced for a lo…
Source: ‘A matter of life or death
I am not a person to be writing a blog about the issue of BAME involvement within politics. I am not expert enough in this particular area nor can I talk of experiences or belief and understanding as whilst I am from an ethnic minority with its own issues I am white . I am writing this from a white perspective to a white reader as this is the only authentic experience I can write from.
I was disappointed at the level of support that a recent BAME rally received recently where Jeremy Corbyn was a key speaker and I felt that I wanted to write about this.
You may or may not be aware but the number of people eligible to vote from Black and Minority Ethnic groups is estimated at 4 million but 30% are not registered to vote.
That is over a million voters.
These are not people who are not going to the polls these are people who have no vote. And to be totally honest I can see why. The last general election the turn out was low. Very low. I voted as I do in every election voting for labour out of loyalty and a deep rooted distrust and possibly hatred (a strong word but think it is right) for all that the Tory party stands for. I was not happy with the Labour Party as I really felt that the middle ground politics, the stereotypical leader, the general lack of real opposition they offered was not screaming to me that a labour government would really be that different. In the minds of so many the legacy of Tony Blair is not what he did that was good but his taking us into an illegal war. And in the minds of many there is no point to voting at all.
The fact that the turnout was so low should worry us. Why are people not involved or engaged? What can we do about it? Just using common sense sociology a quick survey of people around us at work , in our families and community it won’t be long before you will hear the phrase “ I don’t do politics” . My response to you is normally well it is certainly doing you right up the …… But I digress. A look on Facebook can tell you with the I don’t want to see any more political view memes and the I’m sick of politics comments would confirm a body of people who are totally disengaged and remote from anything that goes on in politics.
So what are the political parties doing to engage us?. Well very little. Those who turnout are those who are set in their ideas about their political stance. Those who are not are the disenfranchised and those who really have too much going on in their lives to worry themselves about voting. Those who are not voting are the ones who think that their voice is silent anyway. Those who feel they do not belong. They are the masses and its best they don’t get their say. We can continue to ignore them because they will not have an impact on us getting into power anyway.
Then along comes the referendum. And the turnout on that is huge. Why?
Again our common sense sociology comes into play. Firstly it was a first past the post yes or no vote about an issues that a lot of people felt passionate about. Secondly it was something where people felt that they could actually tell the government exactly what they wanted. It was a voice for those who felt voiceless. And they spoke. And for some reason it shocked the government it shocked the press and it shocked those who voted for change.
And it was a vote based for many on misinformation , misunderstandings , rhetoric , personality and lies. It has released the cork of those who kept their racism bottled up as we see the rise xenophobia and racism. It has left people in limbo as to their rights to stay here. It cause the resignation of one prime minister and the creation of Maggie 2. It caused people to question democracy because the result did not go their way. And it highlighted that given the right circumstances people will engage and will vote.
Now what has this got to do with BAME? Like I said earlier imagine another million votes in this referendum. Imagine another million votes in the general election. Imagine another million voices speaking for a very underrepresented community within politics?
Imagine if it was seen that the voices of the BAME communities in this country counted and meant something to the politicians of this country and that they would be listened to and not ignored? Then we would see issues properly addressed, a more representative government, a movement for change.
Now before you say that the same is true of the voices of every community neglected by successive governments I will say this. There are times in life when you have to narrow down a big problem in order to address what it actually means for each group involved. In society sometimes the reality of existence within it of issues and problems that affect all in different measure has to be highlighted as a separate campaign because to lump it into one group will mean that the problem will be solved to the agenda of one group over another. And in most cases of social issues it is the white issue that is focussed on and is seen as dominant. Solving the white issues however means that a lot of people continue to feel disenfranchised and the issues become their problems, the root cause of issues their behaviour and their attitudes. It ignores the background, the affect, the problems unique to their community which are unseen and unfelt by those outside. Then the very forces who think they are helping all are actually reinforcing the oppressions which they think they are lifting. Hence black lives matter is not saying only black lives matter but highlighting the very real experiences of the feeling, endorsed by society and condoned by law enforcement of the life of black males especially being of no worth. Saying all lives matter in answer to this hides this issues and again we ignore what is ongoing turning the issue onto the very community in fear of the police and loosing their men.
As I stated before I am not the person to speak on behalf of the BAME community. The people to do this are those who organise the rallies who run the campaigns and who understand what particular issues affect people’s engagement with politics. What we can do however is listen to them. Understand what we can do to help by becoming involved in theses causes but not to try and take them over. By advertising their existence and sharing their information. And most importantly we stand beside them. We fight with them. We use the privileges we have to make their voices heard.
My children are mixed ethnicity. I’m white Irish their father Black British. I have argued with them about racism I have disagreed with them about racism until finally I listened to them about racism. I have understood that through institutionalised racism and white privilege everyday behaviour , the things we take for granted, and the things we look at and think what’s your problem here are not imaginations or complaints and excuses. They are real and oppressing and at times very disturbing. It is hard to hear this when you yourself are not racist in your opinions and you hope your actions. But in order to change this we need to accept that there is a different world out there for BAME communities. They are the ones experiencing it every day and they are the ones we need to stand next to, listen to, support to ensure that every person has a voice they feel is valid.
So the next time you see something organised by BAME labour or the next time there is a petition regarding a BAME issue get involved. Stand and talk to people attending them to discover why we need these organisations and groups. Prepare to hear things that will be alien to you beliefs and even shakes your own identity but listen and understand. And show that you want everyone in this country to have a say, to feel empowered, to feel they belong.
And do your bit on social media. Share positive stories about the BAME communities as they get short shrift in the media. Highlight discrimination and stand against it. Learn about the true causes of poverty, homelessness, deprivation in this country and spread these to people you know so the blame is lifted from the immigrant to the feet of those it belongs to, the people who the lowest turnout in a very long time elected into power , possibly illegally.
Work against Islamaphobia, xenophobia, racism in every aspect of your life and do it not because it makes you look a better person but because it is what you want from your soul, the right of every human on this planet to be treated as such. Look inward before you look out and let’s make sure we are all working for each other in every community.
And we can all unite now behind a massive movement, that of supporting Jeremy Corbyn who stands for everyone In every community. To change landscape of politics so everyone can see that they have something to vote for. Someone who speaks at rallies who has supported the causes of those standing against racism who understand the politics of the oppressed and the oppressors and has done so all his life. We can reclaim the Labour Party so that it becomes the party who stands up for all who need support rather than those who pay the most money. Those fighting Jeremy are unaware of the social shift that has been brought about by the awakening of the masses to politics. Those who are are frightened as this will mean the end of their privilege. These masses need to include members of the BAME community who for so long have given so much and received so little. Their unique experiences need to be part of our new society and we need to stand beside them to ensure they are.
I was up late last night. I normally am. At around three there was a ping from my partners I pad. He has BBC news alerts on there.
Like most people if you get a phone call at three ( or a text message thanks very much Owen Smith ) you think “it’s bad news” and it’s the same with the ping – what is happening in the world should we be hiding under the bed?
So I looked at the alert and it was telling me that someone and won something at the Olympics.
After the sigh of relief that we were not about to be annilated I through what the…… Ok it’s interesting and important but really?
So I looked at the BBC news website today and it’s full of olympics stuff. Again I love sport but there is a sports section on the website so why so much on the news.
The other day when the action of the NEC was deemed unlawful in the courts I looked on the website. Headline news is some one holding a medal looking happy .
So today in my mind , which when it comes to the media is a little cynical I will admit, I thought what don’t they want us to know? So I began my usual look through the Internet for any interesting news.
I found within a couple of seconds a Mirror article explaining how a pet project of Iain Duncan Smith ( you remember him the guy who cried on telly about a single mother whilst fighting to hide documentation about how many deaths changes and cuts to disability benefit has caused ) in which those on job seekers allowance were made to go to an office for 35 hours a week and under supervision look for work has been scrapped.
It did not work basically. And it cost £1.4 million pounds.
Mirror – Tories quietly cut IDS pet project
I then found another article in The Guardian about another scheme aimed at helping turn around families lives by support and intervention. This has also failed due to how it was instigated and ran.
That one cost £1.3 billion pounds.
Guardian – failure go government scheme
So in the matter of a few minutes of looking at the newspapers on line I read how the government wasted £1.7 billion pounds.
What could that money have been spent on?
Well £1.5 billion is the bill for student maintenance grants which go to university students from the poorest backgrounds
BBC – scrapping grants
It could pay for the PFI payments for ten of the NHS trusts with the highest debts . At nearly £600 million it could pay it for a couple of years. Of course it could go toward paying off the debts completely which would save the tax payer money and give the NHS money to be spent on medical care.
Telegraph – the true cost of PFI
To put it another in another light £ 1.7 billion is actually higher than the amount of money lost in benefit fraud, with estimates based on government figures as being £1.3 billion . However it is nowhere near the £34 billion in taxes which are not paid , a figure some say is conservative ( no pun intended) and it is more like £120 billion.
The week – which cost more benefit fraud or tax evasion
It is also a drop in the ocean when you consider that it is estimated between £13 billion and £24 billion in unclaimed benefits per year.
Blog – unclaimed benefits
Gov report – take up of benfits
Turn2us – unclaimed benefit
Mirror – unpaid benefits
We all know what has been happening to welfare under this government. We all know the word austerity. We all know who voted for and against welfare cuts. However we are told every day of the cheats and the frauds who are robbing the tax payer. those on benefits who are too lazy to work. We are told of the drain on resources this is.
The media and the government do not want you to know the truth so they hide the release of reports, ensure that the media do not give these stories the blanket coverage they deserve. They wait for good days to bury bad news.
And most importantly they label those rare politicians who know about this, want more money spent on fighting tax evasion , want to ensure that money goes to people who need it are foolish, talk nonsense economics, are unelectable. They want to make sure that those who support them and his plans are seen as easily fooled , Trotskies , out of touch cult followers living in a dream land.
And this is coming from those who claim to be for the people. Claim they stand for true Labour Values. From the Deputy Leader.
Theresa May said the other day that we should not think of austerity as a bad thing but rather that people live within their means. How is it Theresa that the people have to live within their means but the government can waste a substancial amount of money ? Can misinform us about what really costs us the most ? Can de humanise people so that someone actually thought it was right to treat them in a contemptible and humiliating manner. Forcing them to be supervised in an office to look for jobs and which failed.
It is because we keep watching the news and accepting what they say and present without question. Because most people do not spend any time looking at political news as they don’t do politics. They may know the people in suits and shirt sleeves are not working in their best interest but nothing will change.
I would say watch the coverage of plucky Team GB tonight by all means . But then take a few minutes to look elsewhere. Because there is going to be a change, and it would be wonderful if you were a part of it.
Since writing this and after the sad death of the Duke of Westminster , have read his heir will not pay inheritance tax on their fortune. The full article is here.
The late Duke did give to charity and said that he was not happy he was born rich. If this were the case then why take steps to avoid paying tax ? This one payment alone would equal the entire revenue collected by HMRC for inheritance tax from the UK last year. I think his title is rather apt , don’t you ?
So we have today a lovely piece in the guardian today from Tom Watson.
Tom Watson guardian article
I thoughts about how to respond and I though how unfair it is that he gets to express himself in this national newspaper which I think to be honest is also having an existential crisis if that is possible for a newspaper.
And I thought about the response to and the events happened because of a recent blog I posted.
What’s the deal with this guy
My words inspired someone to write a comment which inspired many. This then lead to the responder amongst other things giving a speech and my being asked to write for a website.
What would happen if that voice had larger audience?
Also today I read another post by someone like me. Trying to calmly explain that we are not idiot or fools, we are not the ones hell bent of the distraction of a political movement that we love nor are we all coerced into blindly following one man like a brainwashed cult.
So I shared it on here as it made me think two voices are better than one.
But we have 500,000 voices. Not all of them will sing with us but the majority would.
So here I will post Sarah’s response again to my blog and I am asking you to do something . It is one small thing but we can make it massive.
Take a few seconds to like and then reply. It can be a long or short reply . I want to hear how you feel , why you support Jeremy, why you became interested in politics even why you joined. No insults or derision , no personal attacks or hate. Just why you want Jeremy as leader.
Let’s have a central collection of voices . Share blog posts and links so that all of this information can be put together so all our single voices become one and this can then be shared even more to show people who we truly are.
We have been demeaned and vilified for too long – we need to respond with a united voice.
Please share and post and reblog and Twitter and print and do whatever it takes for this to get off the ground and start running .
Thank you #wearehismedia
July 31, 2016 at 4:09 pm
Hi there! Erm… I’m the woman in the photo! Someone recognised me and sent me your article (very surreal experience). I just thought I’d write a bit to expand on what you’ve said, to give a bit more insight to why I was so lit up.
Growing up, I used to ask questions about what I saw when my dad watched the news. My dad would say “shush I’m watching the news” and my mum would say “I don’t know, I don’t bother with that stuff anymore.” Any mention of something political and she would shut off with a look of faint disgust. As a kid I didn’t really put two and two together, but it made sense later on. That my mum had difficulties with mental health, that she had been prevented from being able to be employed by that and was placed under the additional crushing weight of poverty, trying to get together enough food to keep me and my brother well. That she had no access to any support and at the same time was labelled one of those council estate scroungers… what would that do to your faith in politics? What was the point? They would come along with their promises, rarely aimed at you in any case as you’re below the level they’re pitching at, and would break any designed to shatter poverty/inequality and improve mental health anyway. That’s the thing, even Labour had stopped aiming at families like ours. The rhetoric across all parties became increasingly aimed at those lucky enough to dream of buying a house, not those who struggled to buy bread.
Jump forward to me being a teenager, brought up to treat others nicely, as you never, ever know how bad a day someone is having, so you should try to behave like they might be sad. Because there’s no way of knowing. To have a deep knowledge of how bad things can happen that nobody expects or would will on their worst enemies and that those things can make life hard enough that basic functioning can be a major struggle. Knowing my mum was bitter about politics but that she was proud of having a daughter who cared about stuff, even if she wasn’t sure it would ever end up helping anything. I ended up with my own mental health difficulties, also Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Was knocked flat out of education. Got a middle class boyfriend. Had to explain to him that he couldn’t just say I could help myself to anything in the fridge, that the idea terrified me (anyone who has been in a similar situation might understand that). Hearing his parents talking about politics and feeling hurt for not growing up in a house where politics was something to be discussed, not given up on, and feeling so very, painfully stupid. Relearned that I was different and didn’t truly have a space at the table.
Early twenties, and I’ve have been cajoled into trying university, discover I like it. Study sociology, as it seems to look closest at the things I find fascinating but don’t understand. Hierarchies. Intersections of oppression. Why I have always felt in some vital, essential way different and lower than my middle class counterparts, to those without illness. I learn about inequalities. I learn about micro-aggressions. I learn about it not being all my fault no matter how much my subconscious screams that I’m stupid in spite of my grades. Not that it made much difference, I felt no connection with Labour as much as I wanted to, as it wasn’t fighting for those who desperately needed fighting for, and I felt there was nowhere realistically to turn.
I manage to get a scholarship for a post-grad I could never have afforded otherwise, eventually decide academia is not for me for various reasons, then what happens? The world starts to feel like it’s turning on its head as it looks like someone that’s actually loudly talking about poverty, about mental health, about the benefits of immigration might get into a position of power. Can you imagine? I watch a video and here’s someone talking about how they always, even in times of great stress make sure they *make* time to do nice and relaxing things – promoting self-care for mental health. I see someone suggesting that they aren’t sure about a plan for single gender train carriages and that they need to look at more evidence and *speak to women* to find out if it would really be appreciated. I see someone saying they refuse to be involved in slanging matches, that vociferously campaigned against apartheid, that supported numerous campaigns in spite of them not necessarily being the best for his career. Helping those at the very very bottom is never good for your career. They don’t seem to have the power to immediately make it worth your while. They’re often disenfranchised and bitter about politics and don’t see the point in bothering.
I called my mum to ask her if she’d think about joining as an affiliate (if I sent her a bit of money to cover it) to vote for Corbyn as I felt he could actually do something. She laughed angrily and said “I don’t think so.” She had only recently written to Cameron to explain that the bedroom tax meant she couldn’t afford a winter coat. That there wasn’t a smaller council house for her to move to with her son. He explained in his cookie cutter letter that we all have to make sacrifices and tighten our belts. Can you imagine? Can you? Still, she realised how important it was to me and asked me to explain what I thought was so different.
My mum watches the news now. She watched newsnight even. She calls me to ask me to explain political stuff. She is engaged. She calls Corbyn “our Jeremy, bless ‘im.” But it’s not about just one person, it’s about someone trying to turn the oil tanker that is the Labour Party, trying to get it back on the course we need it to be, when we don’t have any access to the steering wheel. I feel like there might be space for me in the Labour Party now, and my mum. There might be more people who care as deeply and will let us in, not just tell us we’re naive, not tell us we’re stupid, not tell us we’re fanatics, not crow over bits of news reveling in difficulties the campaign has, not rubbing salt in that open wound. There might be a way to feel empowered. To allow my mum to feel empowered. I won’t have been the only one with a story like that either – I can’t tell you how it feels, but “unrestrained joy” comes pretty close.
That’s what was running through my head as I stood there smiling.
Liked by 21 people
The Labour leadership race is all over the news at the moment. My reason for writing this article is just to explain, calmly and rationally, a few of the reasons why I think Jeremy Corbyn is the best bet not only to lead Labour, but the whole of the UK.
Before you roll your eyes and say “another loony lefty, brainwashed by Corbyn”, let me explain to you a little about my background.
I am a 32 year old, self-employed electrician. I love football (I’m a Gooner for what its worth), music and going down the pub. I’m also a father of two beautiful little girls. My parents split when I was 3 years old and I have never been what you would call well off. I rent my home and at this moment in time cannot ever see myself being in a position to buy a home of my own. I have had to work hard for every penny.
I’m not saying not everyone does, but just trying to put into perspective the view many have of your typical “Corbynite”. It seems to me its only the great unwashed or the middle class bourgeoise that people think are backing Jeremy.
This patently isn’t true.
At a recent local meeting, I found people from many different working backgrounds, races, religions and nationalities. We all had one thing in common. A goal. To make the country we live in better for everyone. A desire to make politics fairer, to bring that to the entire nation, not just those that can afford Savile Row suits and second homes.
I hear people complaining all the time about politicians being out of touch, being self-serving, claiming unwarranted expenses. I could go on. The list is endless.
Well at this moment, for the first time in a long while, certainly in my lifetime, we have an opportunity to finally get behind someone who will fight for everyone. Who will fight to see everyone get a say in how we run the country. Not just pay lip service and spew out promises they have no intention of keeping.
“Jeremy Corbyn’s weak and unelectable” is a favourite of the media, but how can a man, who from the very day of being elected leader, has fought against not only his “enemies” (the media and the Tories), but also against his supposed colleagues and peers, be called weak? Its nonsense. Under his leadership, in just nine months, he has already changed the face of politics.
This change has become fashionable with the likes of Theresa May promoting values pioneered by Corbyn in her first ever speech as Prime Minister. Now, we even have Owen Smith taking to the platform in the leadership race with policies that Corbyn has been championing, policies that were deemed “too left and unpopular”. Policies, debates and a surge in membership that have been unprecedented and reawakened and invigorated those like me who were alienated from politics by “business as usual”.
In all honesty, I’d never heard of Jeremy Corbyn until he was elected leader. I too thought, this bloke can’t be Prime Minister. He’s scruffy, he’s too polite etc. I’d long known the media had an agenda and told us what they wanted us to know not what we needed to know, but I still bought into the lies. I paid a passing interest in politics because I’d been told if you don’t vote, you can’t complain about the state of the country. One day that changed.
Rather than looking at Jeremy, I listened. I listened to a man, that actually wasn’t that scruffy, and heard him speak about a society that benefits the many, not the few. I heard a man saying the things I’d said for years, but never heard repeated by a politician. I heard a man speak that sounded like you and me.
Every time I hear Jeremy Corbyn speak, I feel the honesty in his words. Here is a man, I thought, that doesn’t say what he thinks everyone wants to hear. This bloke says what he means, what he actually wants to see happen, and none of it is about him.
People say that Corbyn’s politics and economics are vague, but many of those who criticise him don’t actually take the time to listen. I won’t bandy about facts and figures, but I know that proposing a higher living wage than both the Tories and Owen Smith, with fact based reasons can only be a good thing for everyone.
He has a policy to create 1,000,000 jobs in his first term in office. Real concrete jobs- manufacturing, trade etc. Things a working person can be proud of. He wants to introduce a fair living wage for all, which will enable us to spend and build the economy, rather than those at the top stripping profit and taking money away from our economy for themselves. This is a man that wants to build homes for people. Affordable, decent homes. Hopefully when my children grow up they can afford their own homes. With the current state of the country I’m not confident that’ll be the case.
Immigration is a huge issue for Britain, but I don’t believe that the problems we face are down to immigrants, as many would have you believe. There are masses of evidence out there, that for the past 40 years budgets and cutbacks to our essential services, schools, hospital beds, social housing, jobs, and so on, have been held back by a right wing Labour or cut by the Tories.
If we invested more in these areas, immigration wouldn’t be an issue. Migrants aren’t stealing your jobs, doctors appointments, houses. They’ve been stolen by people that want to gain more for themselves and their mates, without a care in the world for us.
Brexit has seen a peak in these thoughts, and that was all accountable to the Tories. Jeremy Corbyn has got a lot of stick over the Brexit result, but remember he made more appearances than any other Labour MP during the campaign. I still maintain, investment removes these hurdles and immigration would be much less of a flashpoint.
In closing, Jeremy is my choice to lead Britain to better things, because he is an honest man who wants everyone to succeed. Not just those with the money to succeed.
View story at Medium.com
Cook cook cook cookability , that’s the beauty of Gas.
To some reading this the above will mean nothing whilst some will have sung it.
I love watching old adverts. They bring back memories and they give you an insight into the social values of the time as well having created some. They can be brash and cheap or iconic and award winning. They also give us images and words that stick in our mind for years.
That is why I quoted that jingle. It’s stuck along with a lot of other stupid stuff. Perhaps I spent too much time watching television when I was young or perhaps it is indicative of the power of advertising. Whatever it is these trivial memories are normally awakened but a phrase or a tune or sometimes a similar word. So what has triggered this trip down memory lane for me?
The advertising agency that came up with cookability meant for it to convey the way you can control gas when cooking , ease of use , it’s reliability. Looking deeper perhaps it was trying to put across an idea that those who use gas are better cooks or it is more traditional. Looking again at the same word it could be that they basically just hummed a tune and it was the only word that rhymed.
The word was created for a purpose and it was used to sell a product. And I thought of it because I heard a similar word. Electability.
Electability is also a word that can be interpreted in many ways. The general consensus of the media and those who use it is that is indicates the chances of winning an election are based on a persons electability. It indicates if they match what they believe are the most important factors to have to win over the voters. It is a key factor they look in a person who they want to lead them into power. A key factor in electability is generally accepted as image.
We all know appearances matter. Deportment and poise, style and grace , image is seen as everything. An example of this was the famous debate between JFK and Nixon in 1962. The youth and glow of Kennedy against the sweaty and drawn looking Nixon. Those listening on the radio believed Nixon won, but the television audience felt very differently. We now know the chubby face and tan were due to the medication Kennedy took for his Addison’s disease and the sweat down to Nixon not wanting to wear make up and it made a difference as to who won the election. History has shown which was the greater statesman, but it was the start of the image politician. The suit and tie, the smile and haircut and even the stylish wife all help in electability. In the Mad Men age policies and principals started to become secondary to the image. Electability in these terms is really pandering to the dumbing down of politics. To say that a person can only hold office if they are of a certain type or look, background or character. It should be something taken out of politics rather than reinforced. It indicates the power of media in creating and destroying those in public life.
Electability can however be about the policies and aims. In this case a persons electability is affected when it’s assumed the British Public will not vote for the policies of the candidate. Now this is a little more complicated. Recent events have shown that the mind of the British public is not that easily read. Making sweeping assumptions as to what the electorate want is really quite dangerous. Yes for many a choice is made on image, but this is exacerbated by the lack of attention paid to policy and substance due to the factors mentioned above and without this information how can they make that choice. For those who look beyond image it is basically insulting to presume you know what they want. When there is evidence the British Public may well support some of those policies and ideas then to use this term in order to undermine the candidate is really tantamount to dictatorship. In this case the term electability is dangerous , divisive and undemocratic. Surely it is the result of the election, after a campaign which focussed on the aims of the candidate , which shows if a person is electable or not. Claiming otherwise is arrogant , elitist and insults the electorate.
Electability can also be seen as conveying a completely different meaning altogether. Electability can be seen as a term which sums up all of the ideas and concepts that people have about politicians. That a person is very aware of image, having stylists and even taking lessons on how to look good, trustworthy , authoritarian . That a person is aware of the things the public likes to hear and will say them even if they really do not mean them. It can indicate a person who has a background which distances them from the everyday public , such as wealth or privileged education, but is still portrayed as understanding the worker, the poor, the unemployed. It can embody all that is seen as wrong with politics and Westminster. MP’s who are professional performers who spin and lie and twist and turn with seemingly Teflon coating whilst treating the electorate as fodder. Power used a tool for their own self advancement. Here again the media is involved in the creation and sustaining of this kind of electability. In this sense it is a word to be avoided if we want people to engage in politics, to become involved. It helps to keep the halls of power as somewhere only suitable for a certain type, background, gender or ethnicity. Electability alienates and divides and discourages people from believing things can change.
I see electability as a word which has been developed, just in the same way as cookability. Electability is an advertising term because in recent years politicians been seen as nothing more than individuals trying to sell us something , trying to get us to buy , trying to sell us a way of life. And all the time they are basically just looking for the profit at the cost of the consumer .
I see the term electability as encompassing all that is wrong with the government and with politics. A word which says MP’s are not thinking of what is best for the country but what is best them. It indicates a complete selling out of democracy and fairness. It is a word which conveys contempt and arrogance. It’s jargon having no substance or true meaning, used as a blanket to cover the truth and the real intentions of those who use it.
Therefore I am not surprised that this word has been used to describe Jeremy Corbyn. However, it reflects more on those who use it than the one it is used against. It reflects that they see the public as image hungry simpletons with no concept of the workings of government or the power and agenda of the media. The word shows the workings of their minds not ours. It shows contempt and fear that the world in which we went along with all they say is changing and that people have been caught out too many times by advertising to fall for it again.
Next time someone mentions the electability of Jeremy Corbyn just explain what that word means. That is stands for shallow, self serving , power hungry, arrogant, undemocratic, elitist , un inclusive people . People who will always work for the rich and not the poor. Who will line their own pockets and make deals rather than help the electorate. Will stand in the way of anyone who challenges their way of life and who has principles they stick with and a desire to actually make a difference. When they understood this then maybe they will also understand exactly why they have used that against Jeremy. They may understand that is actually not a bad thing to be called.
Just take a look at that picture. I challenge you to look at that picture and not smile.
The expression on that woman’s face is wonderful. There is an unrestrained joy in that face. That face is real and genuine and if just happy.
Happy because she is listening to words that resonate with her and ideas which she can support. Happy because she feels that finally someone is speaking to her personally and saying I see the same things you do. I get angry about the same things you do. I can do something about it.
There is so much more tied up in Jeremy Corbyn than politics. The people who are passionate about him are so because he is a focal point which has inspired action and will inspire more. The bias media coverage of this man has been seen and recorded in three separate reports, highlighting that the news itself has an agenda and it is not one which is in favour of socialism.
What also makes people smile like this when they see or hear Jeremy Corbyn is that you actually know that what he says he means and he will work his hardest to get it. He has principle and morals and he stands by these and that is something unique not normally seen in politics. And that is why the woman is smiling .
She knows that finally to one politician at least she is not collateral , as Theresa May or Owen Smith may see the public as both of them are so keen to push the button on trident. She is not a person to be dismissed because of her sex. She is not just a vote to push someone into power. She knows she to this man she is a living human being not a number, and that is how he sees everyone around the world.
When was the last time you saw anyone create such a look on another persons face?
That is why we are fighting to keep him as leader of the Labour Party.